Remark Labelling is only available from V5.0.8.0 of EyeQuestion
Introduction
Open-ended comments provide valuable insights into the consumer's perception of a product, and help in identifying areas for improvement. However, analyzing such comments can be time-consuming and challenging. With remark labeling, the comments can be easily categorized and analyzed, which saves time and effort while providing meaningful insights.
This feature require panelists to provide detailed feedback about a product using a remark question type, which can be labeled and analyzed to extract meaningful insights.
With this functionality, users can assign specific labels to open-ended comments that panelists have provided about a product. These labels can be anything from positive or negative sentiments, to specific product characteristics or attributes. Once the comments have been labeled, the labels can be used as categories to analyze the frequency of the mentions of a particular product for that specific label using EyeOpenR.
Set Up Your Questionnaire
To use the Remark Labelling functionality the questionnaire must contain at least one question of the type General Question --> G-Text or H- Remark/Comment which allows you to collect open ended answer from your consumers or panelists.
When answers have been collected, go to the export tab and select Remark Labeling.
Create as many labels as you want, there is no limitation.
Select the question you want to add the labels to.
Select the label you want to allocate to which specific comment and click "Confirm".
Analysis through EyeOpenR
Once have you labeled all your remarks, the data can be analyzed in EyeOpenR.
Data can be threated as CATA data, and analysis such as the Cochran and McNemar analysis can be done.
In Counts (pairwise) : The table and graph display the number of times a label appears per product.
Related Articles
Free Choice Profiling
Introduction Free-choice profiling (FCP) is a quick and inexpensive method in which consumers are asked to both identify attributes in the sample and rate the liking and/or intensity of those attributes. They should be provided with adequate ...
Correspondence Analysis (CATA and categorical data)
Purpose To visualise and summarise analyse tabular data and to highlight the patterns of association in two way tables. It is widely used for mapping pure qualitative variables – e.g cluster by demographic use. This is an example of typical data that ...
Penalty Analysis
Purpose To provide a penalty analysis of a consumer data set, that is to investigate how liking or acceptability of product decreases when product attributes are not at the optimal intensity. Data Format Example dataset: Consumer.xlsx Note: for ...
Napping Analysis
Purpose To provide an analysis of data collected using the napping methodology. Data Format Napping.xlsx For EyeOpenR to read your data the first five columns must include the following in the specified order: Assessor, Product, Session, Replica and ...
Just About Right (JAR) and Penalty Analysis
The use of Just-about-right (JAR) scales in consumer research the assessment of product attributes to determine if they are perceived as too high, too low, or "just about right." The information gathered through JAR scales aids in identifying ...